Xứ Việt Nam     XUVN.com

Read in Vietnamese - Bằng Tiếng Việt (Việt ngữ)

  Xứ Việt Nam     A glance at Vietnam 
Google
 

  Vietnamese Music and Performing Arts  

   Vietnam History  
   Vietnamese Society     Diet and Fitness  
 Quick Tour of Vietnam With Pictures    Food of vietnam     
  Vietnam Reading Tour      Vietnamese Music  
  Vietnamese Culture    Vietnamese Recipes

Sex and Race Differences in Fat Distribution among Asian, African-American, and Caucasian Prepubertal Children

Qing He, Mary Horlick, John Thornton, Jack Wang, Richard N. Pierson, Jr., Stanley Heshka and Dympna Gallagher

Obesity Research Center (Q.H., M.H., J.T., J.W., R.N.P., S.H., D.G.), St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital, Institute of Human Nutrition (Q.H., D.G.), and Children’s Hospital of New York (M.H.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10025

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mary Horlick, M.D., Body Composition Unit, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital, Plant Basement, New York, New York 10025. E-mail: . mnh1@columbia.edu

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in fat distribution is thought to emerge during puberty. Truncal or android body fat distribution is characteristic of adult males but is also recognized as a human cardiovascular risk factor. Race differences in truncal fat are clearly evident in adults and have been described in prepubertal children but not between Asians and other race groups. The aim of this study in African-American, Asian, and Caucasian prepubertal children was to evaluate sex differences and race differences in body fat distribution. Analysis of covariance was used to explore fat distribution in 358 prepubertal children (176 girls and 182 boys; 143 Asians, 95 African-Americans, and 120 Caucasians), measured by skinfold thickness and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a cross-sectional study. Extremity and gynoid fat masses were evaluated after adjustment for trunk or android fat, respectively, and for covariates including age, weight, height, and interactions. In Asian children, sex differences were present in models for gynoid fat by DXA only (P < 0.001), with girls having greater gynoid fat than boys. In African-American and Caucasian children, sex differences were present in models for extremity and gynoid fat masses, measured by both methods. Among girls, Asians had generally lower adjusted extremity and gynoid fat than Caucasians and African-Americans. Among boys, Asians had lower adjusted extremity fat by DXA than Caucasians (P < 0.01) but greater gynoid fat by skinfolds than African-Americans (P < 0.01). This study of prepubertal children demonstrates that: 1) sex differences in body fat distribution are present in prepubertal children but that the specific characteristics for Asians differ from African-Americans and Caucasians, and 2) differences in body fat distribution in Asian children, compared with African-Americans and Caucasians, are present but vary by sex. This comparison of African-American, Asian, and Caucasian prepubertal children suggests phenotypic differences. Additional studies are needed to explore the metabolic and health risk implications of these findings.

THE IMPORTANCE OF fat distribution, in addition to total fat, as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease is recognized in both adults (1, 2, 3, 4) and children (5, 6). An android or male fat pattern, with relatively greater fat in the upper body region, is associated with negative metabolic predictors (6, 7, 8). A gynoid or female fat pattern, with relatively greater fat in the hip and thigh areas, is associated with less metabolic risk (9). Similarly, a pattern of fat deposits favoring trunk relative to extremities has also been linked to health risks (10, 11, 12). Identifying the timing of appearance and sex- and race-specific fat distribution patterns in healthy children will establish phenotypes to guide investigation of metabolic implications and possible mechanisms.

Sex differences in fat distribution have been observed in pubertal subjects (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). To our knowledge, only one study (18) reported sexual dimorphism of fat distribution in prepubertal children, using the waist to hip ratio, an index that has been questioned as a valid assessment of fat distribution in children (17). Previous studies have reported race differences in fat distribution in pubertal children (19) and in prepubertal children, including African-Americans and Caucasians (20, 21, 22). Although differences in sc fat and fat distribution in Asian adults, compared with Caucasians, have been described (23, 24), it is unknown whether this is true in prepubertal Asian children.

The aims of this study were to evaluate sex differences in body fat distribution in prepubertal children and race differences in fat distribution in African-American, Asian, and Caucasian children. Two independent methods of assessing fat distribution, anthropometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), were used to investigate relative gynoid and extremity fat mass in 358 healthy children.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Participants were 176 prepubertal girls (52 African-Americans, 69 Asians, and 55 Caucasians) and 182 prepubertal boys (43 African-Americans, 74 Asians, and 65 Caucasians), volunteers in a cross-sectional body composition project (25), with age range 5–12 yr. Volunteers were recruited through local newspaper notices, announcements at schools and after-school centers, and word of mouth. Consent was obtained from each volunteer’s parent or guardian and assent was obtained from each volunteer as well. Consistent Asian, non-Hispanic African-American, or non-Hispanic Caucasian background of both parents and all four grandparents by questionnaire established ethnicity. The Asian volunteers were of Chinese and Korean background. There were no height or weight restrictions to entry into the study. A medical history from the parent or guardian and a physical examination confirmed normal health status. The Institutional Review Board of St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center approved the study.

Pubertal status was established according to the criteria of Tanner (26) by the pediatric endocrinologist or nurse. Serum gonadal steroid and gonadotropin levels measured in a random sample of 29 study participants were consistent with prepubertal status.

Body composition measurement

All medical and body composition evaluations were carried out on the same day at least 1 h after a light meal, with the subject clothed in a hospital gown and wearing foam slippers.

Anthropometry

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg (Weight Tronix, New York, NY) and height to the nearest 0.5 cm using a stadiometer (Holtain, Crosswell, Wales). Skinfold thicknesses were measured to the nearest 1.0 mm with a Lange caliper at the following sites: triceps, biceps, chest, subscapular, abdomen, suprailiac, thigh, and calf. All skinfold measurements were taken on the right side of the body, using the procedures recommended by Lohman et al. (27). The average of two readings was recorded with the measurement to ± 2 mm. Subjects were measured by one of two investigators during the study period. The intraclass correlation coefficients between the two investigators on skinfold measurement were triceps (0.97), biceps (0.89), chest (0.99), subscapular (0.92), abdomen (0.99), suprailiac (0.99), thigh (0.95), and calf (0.97). The skinfold thicknesses comprising trunk, extremity, android, and gynoid fat masses by anthropometry are presented in Table 1Go.

Table 1. Models used to explore whole body fat distribution

 
Model Dependent variable Covariates1

Skinfold thickness
 Model 1 Extremity (sum of calf, thigh, biceps, and triceps) Trunk (sum of subscapular, suprailiac, and abdomen)
 Model 2 Gynoid (sum of abdomen and thigh) Android (sum of chest and subscapular)
DXA fat
 Model 3 Extremity (sum of legs and arms) Trunk (sum of ribs, spine, and pelvis)
 Model 4 Gynoid (sum of pelvis and legs) Android (sum of ribs and spine)

1 Other covariates include age, sex, race, weight, height, interaction between sex and race, and interaction between weight and race.

 DXA

Total body fat, total body fat free mass, regional fat, and regional fat free mass were measured with a whole-body DXA scanner (DPX, Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) using pediatric software version 3.8G.

The calculation of regional soft tissue mass has been previously described in detail (28). Using specific anatomic landmarks, the legs and arms were isolated on the skeletal x-ray planogram (anterior view). The arm encompasses all soft tissue extending from the center of the arm socket to the phalange tips, avoiding contact with the ribs, pelvis, or greater trochanter. The leg consists of all soft tissue extending from an angled line drawn through the femoral neck to the phalange tips. The trunk consists of ribs, spine, pelvis, and greater trochanter. The system software provides the total mass, ratio of soft tissue attenuations, and bone mineral mass for the isolated regions. The ratio of soft tissue attenuation for each region was used to divide bone mineral free tissue of the extremities into fat and fat-free components. The DXA regions are seen in Fig. 1Go, and the regions comprising trunk, extremity, android, and gynoid fat masses by DXA are presented in Table 1Go.



Figure 1. DXA regions (head, arms, ribs, spine, pelvis, legs).

Repeated daily measurements in three adult subjects showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5% for arm fat soft tissue, 1% for leg fat soft tissue, and 2% for trunk fat soft tissue. Reproducibility of DXA in children has been reported (29); however, because of concerns surrounding unnecessary radiation exposure in healthy children, scan reproducibility in children was not performed in our study.

 

 
An anthropomorphic spine phantom made up of calcium hydroxyapatite embedded in a 17.5 x 15 x 17.5 cm lucite block was scanned for quality control on each working day before subject evaluation. The phantom was also scanned immediately before and after all DXA system manufacturer maintenance visits. The measured phantom bone mineral density was stable throughout the study period at 1.166–1.196 g/cm2. Monthly, ethanol and water bottles (8 liter volume), simulating fat and fat-free soft tissues, respectively, were scanned as soft tissue quality control markers. The range in measured R values over the study period was 1.255–1.258 (CV = 0.127%) and 1.367–1.371 (CV = 0.103%), for ethanol and water, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Fat distribution has frequently been expressed as ratios (14, 18, 19). In this study we chose to use analysis of covariance models with gynoid or extremity fat as the dependent variable with other relevant variables as covariates, e.g. trunk fat was treated as a covariate when investigating extremity fat. This approach was chosen to avoid the numerous problems associated with the use of ratios in statistical analysis (30). Analysis of covariance was used to explore sex (female and male) and race (Asian, African-American, and Caucasian) differences in body fat distribution. Trunk or android fat mass, age, weight, and height and their interactions were included as covariates in these analyses. To achieve normal distribution of the residuals of the regression models, log transformation was used to transform both dependent variables and weight. Because of the large number of variables considered in each model, P less than 0.01 was set as the level for statistical significance. To explore race and sex interactions, least squares-mean (LS-mean) values were computed for each dependent variable. Adjusted multiple posthoc comparisons (P < 0.01) were used to evaluate the differences in adjusted means.

All statistics were computed using SAS software version 8 (31).

Models

Body fat distribution was explored using the four models shown in Table 1Go. Models 1–2 evaluate fat distribution measured by skinfold thicknesses, and models 3–4 consider fat distribution measured by DXA. All models included age, sex, race, body weight, height, and two-way interactions; however, only statistically significant interactions were retained. Models 1 and 3 have extremity fat as the dependent variable with trunk fat as a covariate. Models 2 and 4 have gynoid fat as the dependent variable with android fat as a covariate.

Results

The subject characteristics are summarized in Table 2Go. The mean weight and height percentiles for age of the study participants were at the 50th to 75th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts (32).

Table 2. Subject characteristics

 
Variable Asian

African-American

Caucasian

Boys

(n = 74)


Girls

(n = 69)


Boys

(n = 43)


Girls

(n = 52)


Boys

(n = 65)


Girls

(n = 55)


Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD

Age (yr) 8.1 1.5 7.8 1.4 7.7 1.6 7.8 1.5 7.8 1.5 8.2 1.5
Height (cm) 131.6 9.9 127.7 8.7 130.8 11.3 129.5 10.0 131.1 10.3 130.5 11.0
Weight (kg) 31.8 8.6 27.7 6.9 32.2 12.1 30.3 8.4 30.5 9.7 29.6 9.2
Skinfold thickness (mm)
 Abdomen 15.6 10.5 13.6 8.7 11.0 12.1 12.5 9.8 10.7 9.5 11.6 8.1
 Biceps 8.4 5.1 7.8 4.5 6.7 5.1 7.8 4.8 7.3 5.0 7.7 4.6
 Chest 11.6 8.4 10.2 6.9 8.6 9.2 7.2 5.6 7.9 8.1 7.7 5.7
 Calf 16.3 5.9 14.8 5.4 14.8 8.5 17.6 6.9 15.8 7.7 17.1 7.1
 Subscapular 11.0 6.9 10.3 6.2 9.9 8.3 9.6 7.0 8.1 6.2 8.5 7.3
 Suprailiac 11.3 8.6 10.2 6.9 9.4 10.4 9.8 8.5 7.8 7.0 8.3 5.6
 Thigh 20.9 9.9 19.9 7.9 18.2 13.8 21.4 11.4 18.7 11.0 22.4 10.2
 Triceps 14.2 6.1 14.1 5.5 12.0 8.6 13.6 7.2 12.5 6.4 13.0 5.8
DXA fat (kg)
 Arms 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
 Legs 2.9 1.7 2.7 1.5 3.0 3.2 3.3 2.4 2.6 2.0 3.0 2.1
 Pelvis 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.6
 Ribs + spine 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 2.2 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.7
 Trunk 2.8 2.1 2.4 1.9 2.4 3.2 2.3 2.5 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.3
 Total body fat 7.0 4.4 6.4 4.0 6.5 7.3 6.9 5.7 5.6 4.9 6.5 5.0

 
Analysis of covariance was used with log-transformed extremity fat (models 1 and 3) or gynoid fat (models 2 and 4) mass as the dependent variables (Table 3Go). All models (1, 2, 3, 4) were statistically significant with R2 values ranging from 0.83–0.95.

Table 3. Analysis of covariance models with body fat measurement (skinfold thickness or DXA fat mass) as the dependent variable

 
Variable Extremity

Gynoid

Model 1 (skinfold) R2 = 0.83 P < 0.0001

Model 3 (DXA) R2 = 0.95 P < 0.0001

Model 2 (skinfold) R2 = 0.84 P < 0.0001

Model 4 (DXA) R2 = 0.94 P < 0.0001

ß t ß t ß t ß t

Trunk 0.45 12.35 0.56 20.83
Android 0.55 11.32 0.48 17.55
Age 0.00 0.12 0.01 0.91 -0.01 -0.49 0.01 1.05
Sex1 -0.18 -4.78 -0.20 -6.32 -0.29 -6.28 -0.27 -8.26
A2 0.83 2.71 0.61 2.48 0.64 1.69 0.84 3.21
C2 0.49 1.63 0.34 1.41 0.19 0.52 0.40 1.55
Sex-A3 0.16 3.34 0.16 4.03 0.24 4.06 0.19 4.44
Sex-C3 0.09 1.76 0.13 3.08 0.08 1.29 0.10 2.35
Weight 0.79 5.61 0.82 6.46 1.06 5.97 0.81 5.69
Weight-A3 -0.26 -2.88 -0.23 -3.10 -0.20 -1.80 -0.29 -3.71
Weight-C3 -0.12 -1.37 -0.11 -1.55 -0.03 -0.30 -0.13 -1.77
Height -0.01 -3.27 -0.01 -2.47 -0.01 -3.09 -0.00 -1.35
Intercept 0.99 3.87 -1.29 -4.39 -0.19 -0.58 -1.07 -3.19

ß coefficients with a P value less than 0.01 are in bold.

1 Sex: boy = 1; girl = 0.

2 Race: A = 1 for Asian, A = 0 for otherwise; C = 1 for Caucasian; C = 0 for otherwise.

3 Interaction: sex and race; weight and race.

 A main effect for sex was found using both skinfold and DXA methods, with girls having greater extremity and gynoid fat deposits, compared with boys, after adjusting for covariates (models 1–4). A main effect for race was also found in some of the models (models 1 and 4). The effect of age was not significant in any of the models.

Because significant sex and race interactions were present in models 1–4 (Table 3Go), LS-mean and SE values were computed for the dependent variables (log extremity fat mass and log gynoid fat mass) adjusted for trunk or android fat, respectively, as well as for age, weight, height, and sex-race interactions. The LS-mean values by sex within race and by race within sex are all presented in Figs. 2Go and 3Go.



Figure 2. Adjusted means and SE of log-transformed values for skinfold-derived extremity (a) and gynoid (b) fat and for DXA-derived extremity (c) and gynoid (d) fat. *, Adjusted multiple post hoc comparisons (P < 0.01) were used to evaluate the sex differences in adjusted means within each race group.

 

 


Figure 3. Adjusted means and SE of log-transformed values for skinfold-derived extremity (a) and gynoid (b) fat and for DXA-derived extremity (c) and gynoid (d) fat. *, Adjusted multiple post hoc comparisons (P < 0.01) were used to compare the adjusted means for Asians with those for African-Americans and Caucasians. Boys and girls were analyzed separately.

 

 
Sex

In Asians, fat distribution differed significantly between girls and boys in the DXA-derived gynoid fat model only (Fig. 2dGo), with greater gynoid fat deposit in girls than in boys (P < 0.001). However, sex differences in body fat distribution were found in all models for Caucasians (P < 0.01) and African-Americans (P < 0.0001), with girls having greater extremity and gynoid fat deposits than boys (Fig. 2Go).

Race

Among girls, Asians had less skinfold derived extremity (Fig. 3aGo) and gynoid fat (Fig. 3bGo) than Caucasians (P < 0.01) but were not significantly different from African-Americans. For DXA-derived extremity fat (Fig. 3cGo), Asians had less than Caucasians and African-Americans (P < 0.0001). For DXA-derived gynoid fat (Fig. 3dGo), Asians had less than African-Americans (P < 0.001) but were not significantly different from Caucasians.

Among boys, Asians had more skinfold-derived gynoid fat (Fig. 3bGo) than African-Americans (P < 0.001) but were not significantly different in skinfold-derived extremity fat from African-Americans (Fig. 3aGo). Asians and Caucasians did not differ in skinfold-derived extremity (Fig. 3aGo) and gynoid fat (Fig. 3bGo). For DXA-derived extremity fat (Fig. 3cGo), Asians had less than Caucasians (P < 0.01) but did not differ significantly from African-Americans. DXA-derived gynoid fat did not differ significantly among the three race groups in boys (Fig. 3dGo).

Discussion

This study, using two independent methods of regional fat measurement, is the first to compare body fat distribution in prepubertal African-Americans, Asians, and Caucasians. Although the manifestation of sexual dimorphism was different in Asian children, the results confirm that sex-specific patterns of greater relative extremity or gynoid fat deposition in girls start well before the appearance of the physical signs of puberty. Body fat distribution in Asian children differed from Caucasians and African-Americans, but the findings varied by sex. These findings demonstrate that phenotyping of body composition traits in children requires sex and race specificity. Such investigation is an essential prerequisite for accurate assessment of associated metabolic implication and health risks.

Sex difference in fat distribution

Sexual dimorphism of total body composition has been described in prepubertal children, with greater fat free mass and less fat mass in boys, compared with girls, after controlling for ethnicity, age, height, and weight (18, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37). Sexual dimorphism of body fat distribution had previously been reported to emerge during puberty (13, 14, 15, 17), implying that factors regulating sex-specific total body composition are present in prepubertal children but that those determining regional body composition appear during puberty. Mast et al. (18) reported sex differences in whole-body fat distribution in prepubertal children, using waist to hip ratio. Besides numerous problems associated with the use of ratios from a statistical analysis perspective (30), waist to hip ratio has been challenged as a valid assessment of fat distribution in children (17) because it reflects bone-related hip circumference as much as fat. In our study of anthropometric and DXA measures of fat in prepubertal children, using analysis of covariance rather than ratios, sex differences in fat distribution were evident. This investigation of sex differences in prepubertal children is consistent with the suggestion of the National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine that differences between males and females should be evaluated from womb to tomb (38). Additional studies are needed to understand the metabolic and health risk implications of the observed differences.

Gonadal steroids are the major mediators of sexual dimorphism of body composition in adults, including body fat patterning (39, 40), a role that is further substantiated by the identification of gonadal steroid receptors in adipose tissue (41, 42). The demonstration by Klein et al. (43), that prepubertal girls have greater levels of circulating E2 than prepubertal boys, suggests a role for gonadal steroids in the subtle sex differences in fat patterning observed in this study. Recent reports have shown that gonadotropins and gonadal steroids gradually increase from 5 yr of age in prepubertal children, implying that their effects may be more evident in older than younger prepubertal children (44, 45, 46). Other hormones with putative roles in body fat distribution include leptin and GH, which have distinct but interrelated diurnal patterns, but are also influenced by gonadal steroids (47).

The differences in fat distribution observed in this cross-sectional study of children with an age span of 5–12 yr did not change with age when other covariates were included in the analysis. This leads us to propose that fat distribution may not be mediated by gonadal steroids in prepubertal children but rather by other factors, including possible nonhormonal sex-specific mechanisms. Because of possible collinearity of age, height, weight, and fat variables, this analysis cannot definitively demonstrate if age affects fat distribution in prepubertal children. A potential limitation of this study is the fact that hormone levels were available in only a small subset of patients and therefore pubertal status could not be confirmed biochemically. Inclusion of hormonal and bone age information in future investigations in smaller numbers of prepubertal children across this age range would allow exploration of possible mechanisms for the observed sex differences in fat distribution.

Race differences in fat distribution

In studies of adult females, Asians had greater trunk sc fat than Caucasians (23), whereas Caucasians had greater limb sc fat (24). Malina et al. (19) reported that adolescent Asian girls had more trunk sc fat than Caucasian girls. The current study shows that adjusted mean skinfold- and DXA-derived extremity fat were lower in prepubertal Asians than Caucasian girls. Because body size (weight and height) was controlled when sex and race interactions in fat distribution were explored, we can infer that Asian girls have greater relative truncal or central fat mass.

In the current study, Asian boys had less adjusted mean DXA-derived extremity fat than Caucasians, whereas the skinfold method revealed no race differences. Others (24) have reported that Asian adults have more upper-body sc fat than Caucasians and that the magnitude of the race difference is greater in females than in males. Therefore, we propose that the greater Asian/Caucasian differences in fat distribution between women, compared with that between men, are already evident in prepubertal children.

The recognition of race differences in fat distribution is of clinical importance, especially because the metabolic implications of particular body composition parameters may vary among races. For example, the strength of association between specific fat depots and insulin sensitivity or high density lipoprotein-cholesterol was found to be different in black and white children (22, 48). The identification of race differences in fat distribution needs to be followed by metabolic studies to clarify associations with health risk.

The observed race and sex differences in fat distribution may reflect differences in physical activity, nutrition, or socioeconomic status of the family, information that was not available on our subjects (49). For example, it has been reported that physical activity has significant influence on total body composition (percentage body fat) in early childhood (50). It has been also reported that the increase of visceral adipose tissue is significantly less in children who exercise, compared with children who do not exercise (51). Data on activity as well as on nutrition and socioeconomic status would be important additions to future investigations of the sex and race differences in fat distribution observed in this study.

Sample selection bias may be a limitation of the current study because the subjects were recruited voluntarily through local newspaper advertisements and announcements at schools and after-school activity centers. However, because the mean weight and height percentiles for age of the study participants were at the 50th to 75th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts (32), this information may be transferable to other healthy prepubertal pediatric populations.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that sex differences in body fat distribution are present before the onset of puberty in African-American, Asian, and Caucasian children but that the specific characteristics differ with race. Race differences are also present, but these vary with sex. These findings emphasize the importance of sex- and race-specific interpretation of body composition results to define phenotypes and the need for further studies to explore their particular associations with health risks.

 

Acknowledgments

 

Footnotes

This work was supported in part by NIH Grants RO1-DK-37352 and R29-AG-14715 and an educational grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb Mead Johnson.

Abbreviations: CV, Coefficient of variation; DXA, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; LS-mean, least squares-mean.

Received August 8, 2001.

Accepted January 16, 2002.

References

 

  1. Bouchard C, Bray GA, Hubbard VS 1990 Basic and clinical aspects of regional fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr 52:946–950 [Free Full Text]
  2. Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, Evans DJ, Hartz AJ, Kalkhoff RK, Adams PW 1982 Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 54:254–260 [Abstract]
  3. Krotkiewske, M, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Smith U 1983 Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women. Importance of regional adipose tissue distribution. J Clin Invest 72:1150–1162
  4. Vague J 1996 The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a factor determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout, and uric calculous disease. 1956. Obes Res 4:204–212 [Medline]
  5. Shear CL, Freedman DS, Burke GL, Harsha DW, Berenson GS 1987 Body fat patterning and blood pressure in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Hypertension 9:236–244 [Abstract]
  6. Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Sprecher DL, Khoury P, Kimball TR 1999 Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. Circulation 99:541–545 [Medline]
  7. Curb JD, Marcus EB 1991 Body fat, coronary heart disease, and stroke in Japanese men. Am J Clin Nutr 53:1612S–1615S
  8. Walton C, Lees B, Crook D, Worthington M, Godsland IF, Stevenson JC 1995 Body fat distribution, rather than overall adiposity, influences serum lipids and lipoproteins in healthy men independently of age. Am J Med 99:459–464 [CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Ashwell M 1994 Obesity in men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18:S1–S7
  10. Smoak CG, Burke GL, Webber LS, Harsha DW, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS 1987 Relation of obesity to clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and young adults. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 125:364–372 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Williams MJ, Hunter GR, Kekes-Szabo T, Snyder S, Treuth MS 1997 Regional fat distribution in women and risk of cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 65:855–860 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sardinha LB, Teixeira PJ, Guedes DP, Going SB, Lohman TG 2000 Subcutaneous central fat is associated with cardiovascular risk factors in men independently of total fatness and fitness. Metabolism 49:1379–1385 [Medline]
  13. Malina RM, Bouchard C 1988 Subcutaneous fat distribution during growth. In: Bouchard C, Johnston FE, eds. Fat distribution during growth and later health outcomes. New York: Plenum; 63–84
  14. Rolland-Cachera MF, Bellisle F, Deheeger M, Pequignot F, Sempe M 1990 Influence of body fat distribution during childhood on body fat distribution in adulthood: a two-decade follow-up study. Int J Obes 14:473–481 [Medline]
  15. Cowell CT, Briody J, Lloyd-Jones S, Smith C, Moore B, Howman-Giles R 1997 Fat distribution in children and adolescents—the influence of sex and hormones. Horm Res 48(Suppl 5):93–100
  16. Malina RM 1996 Regional body composition: age, sex, and ethnic variation. In: Roche AF, Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, eds. Human body composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 217–256
  17. Weststrate JA, Deurenberg P, van Tinteren H 1989 Indices of body fat distribution and adiposity in Dutch children from birth to 18 years of age. Int J Obes 13:465–477 [Medline]
  18. Mast M, Kortzinger I, Konig E, Muller MJ 1998 Gender differences in fat mass of 5–7-year old children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22:878–884 [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Malina RM, Huang YC, Brown KH 1995 Subcutaneous adipose tissue distribution in adolescent girls of four ethnic groups. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 19:793–797 [Medline]
  20. Mueller EH 1987 Ethnic differences in fat distribution during growth. In: Bouchard C, Johnston FE, eds. Fat distribution during growth and later health outcomes. New York: Alan R Liss, Inc.; 127–145
  21. Greaves KA, Puhl J, Baranowski T, Gruben D, Seale D 1989 Ethnic differences in anthropometric characteristics of young children and their parents. Hum Biol 61:459–477 [Medline]
  22. Yanovski JA, Yanovski SZ, Filmer KM, Hubbard VS, Avila N, Lewis B, Reynolds JC, Flood M 1996 Differences in body composition of black and white girls. Am J Clin Nutr 64:833–839 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chen KP, Damon A, Elliot O 1963 Body form, composition and some physiological functions of Chinese on Taiwan. Ann N Y Acad Sci 110:769–777
  24. Wang J, Thornton JC, Russell M, Burastero S, Heymsfield S, Pierson Jr RN 1994 Asians have lower body mass index (BMI) but higher percent body fat than do whites: comparisons of anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 60:23–28 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Horlick M, Thornton J, Wang J, Levine LS, Fedun B, Pierson Jr RN 2000 Bone mineral in prepubertal children: gender and ethnicity. J Bone Miner Res 15:1393–1397 [CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Tanner JM 1962 Growth and adolescence, ed 2. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  27. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds. 1988 Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
  28. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J 1990 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1106–1112 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Figueroa-Colon R, Mayo MS, Treuth MS, Aldridge RA, Weinsier RL 1998 Reproducibility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in prepubertal girls. Obes Res 6:262–267 [Abstract]
  30. Allison DB, Paultre F, Goran MI, Poehlman ET, Heymsfield SB 1995 Statistical considerations regarding the use of ratios to adjust data. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 19:644–652 [Medline]
  31. SAS Institute Inc. 1999 SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  32. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics 2000 CDC growth charts: United States. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/growthcharts/charts.htm. Accessed May 30, 2001
  33. Tanner JM, Hughes PC, Whitehouse RH 1981 Radiographically determined widths of bone muscle and fat in the upper arm and calf from age 3–18 years. Ann Hum Biol 8:495–517 [CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Taylor RW, Gold E, Manning P, Goulding A 1997 Gender differences in body fat content are present well before puberty. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 21:1082–1084 [CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Horlick M, Thornton J, Wang J, Fedun B, La Plante N, Levine LS, Pierson Jr RN 1998 Determinants of fat-free mass (FFM) and its subcomponents in prepubertal children (abstract). FASEB J 12:A651
  36. Ruxton CH, Reilly JJ, Kirk TR 1999 Body composition of healthy 7- and 8-year-old children and a comparison with the ‘reference child.’ Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23:1276–1281 [CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Butte NF, Hopkinson JM, Wong WW, Smith EO, Ellis KJ 2000 Body composition during the first 2 years of life: an updated reference. Pediatr Res 47:578–585 [Medline]
  38. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences 2001 Exploring the biological contributions to human health: Does sex matter? Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10028.html. Accessed April 24, 2001
  39. Marin P, Bjorntorp P 1993 Endocrine-metabolic patterns and adipose tissue distribution. Horm Res 39:81–85
  40. Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL 1999 Role of gonadal steroids in the sexual dimorphisms in body composition and circulating concentrations of leptin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1784–1789 [Free Full Text]
  41. Price TM, O’Brien 1993 Determination of estrogen receptor mRNA and cytochrome P450 aromatase mRNA levels in adipocytes and adipose stromal cells by competitive polymerase chain reaction amplification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77:1041–1045 [Abstract]
  42. O’Brien SN, Welter BH, Mantzke KA, Price TM 1998 Identification of progesterone receptor in human subcutaneous adipose tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:509–513 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Klein KO, Baron J, Colli MJ, McDonnell DP, Cutler Jr GB 1994 Estrogen levels in childhood determined by an ultrasensitive recombinant cell bioassay. J Clin Invest 94: 2475–2480
  44. Mitamura R, Yano K, Suzuki N, Ito Y, Makita Y, Okuno A 1999 Diurnal rhythms of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and testosterone secretion before the onset of male puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:29–37 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Mitamura R, Yano K, Suzuki N, Ito Y, Makita Y, Okuno A 2000 diurnal rhythms of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone and estradiol secretion before the onset of female puberty in short children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1074–1080 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Veldhuis JD, Pincus SM, Mitamura R, Yano K, Suzuki N, Ito Y, Makita Y, Okuno A 2001 Developmentally delimited emergence of more orderly luteinizing hormone and testosterone secretion during late prepuberty in boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:80–89 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Roemmich JN, Clark PA, Mai V, Berr SS, Weltman A, Veldhuis JD, Rogol AD 1998 Alterations in growth and body composition during puberty: III. Influence of maturation, gender, body composition, fat distribution, aerobic fitness, and energy expenditure on nocturnal growth hormone release. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1440–1447 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Herd SL, Gower BA, Dashti N, Goran MI 2001 Body fat, fat distribution and serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in African-American and Caucasian-American prepubertal children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25:198–204 [CrossRef][Medline]
  49. American Academy of Pediatrics 2000 Race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status—research exploring their effects on child health: a subject review. Pediatrics 105:1349–1351 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Atkin LM, Davies PS 2000 Diet composition and body composition in preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr 72:15–21 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Owens S, Gutin B, Allison J, Riggs S, Ferguson M, Litaker M, Thompson W 1999 Effect of physical training on total and visceral fat in obese children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:143–148 [Medline]
 

    Xứ Việt Nam      A glance at Vietnam  
Google
 
  Vietnamese Music and Performing Arts       Vietnam History    
   Vietnamese Society      Diet and Fitness  
 Quick Tour of Vietnam With Pictures    Food of vietnam     
   Vietnam Reading Tour      Vietnamese Music  
   Vietnamese Culture      Vietnamese Recipes 

Read in Vietnamese - Bằng Tiếng Việt (Việt ngữ)